Because this is a highly proprietary commercial text, you can only find valid links and access points through licensed platforms. 1. Subscription Databases
. The authoritative text for New York evidence law, originally authored by William Payson Richardson and later updated by Jerome Prince and Richard T. Farrell, is currently available as an online resource that is updated irregularly rather than through traditional numbered editions.
New York is one of the few jurisdictions in the United States that has not adopted a codified set of evidence rules, such as the Federal Rules of Evidence (FRE). Instead, New York evidence law is a blend of common law precedent, statutory rules scattered throughout the Civil Practice Law and Rules (CPLR) and Criminal Procedure Law (CPL), and constitutional mandates.
For New York litigators, judges, and law students, a single text serves as the ultimate authority on evidentiary rules: . First published by Brooklyn Law School founder William Payson Richardson and later edited by renowned evidence scholar Dean Jerome Prince, this treatise has spent decades as the preeminent reference text on the New York law of evidence. prince richardson on evidence 12th edition link
A deep dive into whether evidence makes a fact more or less probable.
: Academic bookstores often carry new or used copies for student use. 3. Physical Libraries
Though New York has not adopted the Federal Rules of Evidence, the 12th Edition mirrors their organizational scheme, making it more intuitive for a generation of lawyers trained in federal standards. Practical Depth: From the "Best Evidence Rule" to nuances in Admissibility and Exceptions Because this is a highly proprietary commercial text,
Hearsay remains one of the most litigated areas of trial practice. Richardson on Evidence delineates where New York law diverges sharply from federal interpretations. For example, New York maintains its own distinct standards for admitting dying declarations, excited utterances, and declarations against interest. 2. The Right to Confrontation
To comprehend why this specific treatise is so vital, one must understand how New York treats evidence. While many states codified their rules into a single cohesive book of statutes during the 20th century, New York resisted full codification. Common Law vs. Codification
If you are preparing for bar exams, writing a factum, or arguing a voir dire, this edition is non-negotiable. The authoritative text for New York evidence law,
Extensively revised chapter focusing on original documents versus secondary evidence.
Rules surrounding the use of prior inconsistent statements, bias, and prior bad acts.
Understanding New York Evidence: A Guide to Prince, Richardson on Evidence
While New York remains one of the few states without a codified code of evidence, relying instead on a "common law" patchwork of statutes and court rulings, Prince, Richardson on Evidence acts as the de facto code. 12th Edition
Your (e.g., physical hardcover, LexisNexis digital access, or a used copy)